Why choose Zeno over other CAPTCHA systems?
| Feature | Zeno | Altcha | ReCAPTCHA | Turnstile |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | Memory + Time (Physics) | CPU Hashing (SHA-256) | Behavioral | Behavioral / PoW |
| ASIC Resistance | High (32MB RAM default) | Low (Hashable by ASIC) | N/A | Low |
| GPU Resistance | High (Memory-bound) | None (Compute-bound) | N/A | Low |
| Bot Farm Defense | High (32GB for 1k threads) | Low (Cheap cores scale) | Variable | Variable |
| Privacy | 100% Zero-Knowledge | 100% Zero-Knowledge | Tracking | Limited Tracking |
| Cost to Bot | High RAM + Forced Wait | Low CPU | Risk of detection | Low CPU |
Most PoW CAPTCHAs rely on a simple hash puzzle (like SHA-256).
The Flaw: Hashing is “Compute-Bound”. Attackers can use:
The Zeno Fix: Zeno is “Memory-Bound”.
Behavioral systems rely on “Trust Scores” based on:
The Flaw:
The Zeno Fix: Zeno is Blind.
| Attack Method | vs SHA-256 PoW | vs Behavioral | vs Zeno |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rent 1000 VPS | ✅ Effective | ⚠️ Detected | ❌ Need 32GB RAM each |
| Buy ASIC | ✅ 1M× speedup | N/A | ❌ Can’t add RAM to ASIC |
| Rent GPU Farm | ✅ 1000× speedup | N/A | ❌ Memory-bound, not compute |
| AI Mouse Faker | N/A | ✅ Effective | ❌ Irrelevant (no behavior check) |
| Headless Browser | ⚠️ Slow but works | ⚠️ Sometimes detected | ❌ Must still solve physics |
| If your threat is… | Best Solution |
|---|---|
| Script kiddies | Any PoW works |
| Professional bot farms | Zeno (memory wall) |
| State-level attackers with ASICs | Zeno (memory wall) |
| AI-powered automation | Zeno (physics > behavior) |
| Privacy-conscious users | Zeno (no tracking) |